Monday, July 16, 2007
Mitt Romney Loves Him The Gay Sex
The lunatics at World Net Daily(AKA Wingnut Daily) believe that Mitt Romney is a homosexual loving liberal. He did something that proved his mendacity. You see, when the Supreme Court of Massachusetts stated that civil unions had to be allowed, Romney obeyed them. And he wants to be President?
To see what could have happened, several experts suggest a review of history.
Titus noted the 1857 Dred Scott decision, in which the U.S. Supreme Court had declared a slave was the property of the master, even if they both were physically in a free state. But President Lincoln rejected the authority of that opinion.
What a coward. The issues are totally the same. Dehumanizing blacks is equal to humanizing homosexuals. A good conservative would have declared the gays 3/5 of a human being and told the court to blow him.
FitzGibbon also told WND the Goodridge opinion included no requirements.
"My opinion is that the Supreme Judicial Court's decision in Goodridge v. Department of Public Health (2003) did not mandate that the executive branch issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples," he wrote in an e-mail.
In a previously issued statement he made in support of the Federal Marriage Amendment, FitzGibbon warned of the immediate and dramatic social impact of such a decision, including a mandate by public schools in Massachusetts to teach homosexuality to children.
Exactly. Now first graders in Massachusetts are being taught the proper way to fist, given a demonstation on using lube, and they are also shown how to color co-ordinate a living room. Thanks Mitt Romney.
FitzGibbon said under the logic and arguments of the Goodridge decision, there is no reason why only pairs should be supported by law.
"Polygamy – the absurdity to which SSM advocates resisted being reduced in argument even a year or two ago – has recently come to be treated by leading authorities as eligible for legal recognition," he said.
Romney is a Mormon. Could he have been angling for group gay marriage? One day, RuPaul, Lindsey Graham, and Elton John could be legally married as a threesome under this theory.
Noted conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly is devastated as well. Sure, her son is gay, but that is the point. Allow civil unions and she might have a hard time figuring out which side of the church to sit in, if his boyfriend pops the question.
Schlafly also has rejected the idea that Romney somehow was forced into action.
"[Romney] said: 'We obviously have to follow the law as provided by the [Court] and ... decide 'what kind of statute we can fashion which is consistent with the law.' But what 'law'?" Schlafly asked. "There is no law that requires or even allows same-sex marriages."
There also is no law that "I have to pay for the ice sculpture of David teabagging Adonis either". Her son John has his heart set on that for his vows. Schafly might allow Mehlman's parents to swing the whole tab. It's so upsetting.
Damn you Mitt Romney. You are ruining everything!
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
|