Showing posts with label big brother. Show all posts
Showing posts with label big brother. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 22, 2007
Seattle pediatrician Rupin Thakkar's first inkling that the pharmaceutical industry was peering over his shoulder and into his prescription pad came in a letter from a drug representative about the generic drops Thakkar prescribes to treat infectious pinkeye.
In the letter, the salesperson wrote that Thakkar was causing his patients to miss more days of school than they would if he put them on Vigamox, a more expensive brand-name medicine made by Alcon Laboratories.
"My initial thought was 'How does she know what I'm prescribing?' " Thakkar said. "It feels intrusive. . . . I just feel strongly that medical encounters need to be private."
He is not alone. Many doctors object to drugmakers' common practice of contracting with data-mining companies to track exactly which medicines physicians prescribe and in what quantities -- information marketers and salespeople use to fine-tune their efforts. The industry defends the practice as a way of better educating physicians about new drugs.
The industry happens to be full of crap. Just saying.
Sunday, May 20, 2007
An article in the BBC just confirms my fears of what society will be coming to in the very near future in regards to privacy.
Deputy chief constable of Hampshire Ian Readhead said Britain could become a surveillance society with cameras on every street corner. He told the BBC's Politics Show that CCTV was being used in small towns and villages where crime rates were low.
Mr Readhead also called for the retention of some DNA evidence and the use of speed cameras to be reviewed. His force area includes the small town of Stockbridge, where parish councillors have spent £10,000 installing CCTV.
Mr Readhead questioned whether the relatively low crime levels justified the expense and intrusion."I'm really concerned about what happens to the product of these cameras, and what comes next?" he said."If it's in our villages, are we really moving towards an Orwellian situation where cameras are at every street corner?
It's the frog in the slowly boiling pot of water in action. First we say that because of terrorism, or the children, or high crime in certain areas that we need to spy on everybody in those regards. But, of course it will be limited. Then small towns with little crime start installing cameras. Soon, you will be able to not walk anywhere without being spied upon.
How about in your home you say? Wait for it. I predict that soon, insurance companies will offer you "a discount" (read current rates) if you set up a camera system that is available to the police. That way, they can respond in emergencies more quickly, preventing a greater insurance loss in case of fire, burglary and the like.
How many of us sign up for grocery "savings cards" for convenience, where we don't really get good deals. We are punished by higher prices for not letting our information be shared, sold, and scattered among several data banks or suffer the consequences of less money in our wallets.
No political movement is spreading up here to fight it. The Republicans are going through a drunk with authoritarianism bender at the moment. The democrats are just nibbling at the edges. We will wake up one day, with our DNA stored at birth, our lives videotaped from cradle to grave, and who will stop it once it is already fait accompli?
Subscribe to:
Comment Feed (RSS)
